SOIL-ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES OF THE EARLY BRONZE AGE SETTLEMENT ARTANISH-9 (REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA)

Abstract


The article presents the results of comprehensive soil and archaeological studies of the early Bronze Age settlement of the Kura-Araks culture Artanish-9, located on the shore of Lake Sevan (Republic of Armenia). The cultural layer inside the residential building and in the inter-residential space is investigated. A microelement analysis of the cultural layer was carried out. To assess the intensity of transformation of the original soil as a result of the vital activity of ancient population, the coefficients of "anthropogenic input" are proposed, which reflect the intensity of the input of anthropogenic material into the soil and are calculated as the ratio of the content of phosphorus and sulfur as the main biogenic elements to the sum of the contents of silicon and aluminum as the main lithogenic elements (respectively, P/(Si+Al), S/(Si+Al)). A metalurgical production site has been localized, which is confirmed by the found bronze products, crucibles and foundry molds. The cultural layer in this location is characterized by an abnormally high sulfur content, which can be attributed to the gypsum entry into the soil, which was used in the creation of molds. According to the results of chemical analyses, the cultural layer of the monument is mainly represented by clay material, which indicates the presence of adobe walls and clay paving of the floor. The clay used in the construction and the clay in the immediate vicinity of the monument are absolutely of the same type, which indicates the use of local raw materials. Sections of the cultural layer with increased enzymatic activity have been identified, which indicates that large volumes of organic material of anthropogenic nature have entered the soil. Such sites presumably correspond to places of accumulation of household garbage, which is confirmed by a high concentration of artifacts and bones.


Tatiana Khomutova

Институт физико-химических и биологических проблем почвоведения РАН

Author for correspondence.
Email: khomutova-t@rambler.ru

Russian Federation

кандидат биологических наук, ведущий научный сотрудник лаборатории археологического почвоведения

Elena Chernysheva

Email: chernysheva1988@gmail.com

Anastassiya Potapova

Email: anastassiia4272@gmail.com

Maxim Yeltsov

Email: m.v.eltsov@gmail.com

Viktor Pinskoy

Email: pinskoy@inbox.ru

Mariam Amiryan

Email: amiryanm@ymail.com

  • Martirosyan AA. Armenia in the Bronze and Early Iron epoch [Armeniya v epokhu bronzy i rannego zheleza]. Yerevan: AN Arm SSR, 1964:202. (In Russ).
  • Smith A., Badalyan Р., Pavelavetisyan P., Greene A., Minc L. The Foundations of Research and Regional Survey in the Tsaghkahovit Plain, Armenia. The Archaeology and Geography of Ancient Transcaucasian Societies. Schramer l., Urban T., Jonson Kl, editors; Chicago: Oriental Institute Publications Series, 2009. 1(134): 410.
  • Bisicione R., Hmayakyan S., Parmegiani N. The North-Estern Frontier: Urartians and Non-Urartians in the Sevan Lake Basin, I. The Southern Shores, Roma: CNR Istituto di studi sulle civiltà dell'Egeo e del Vicino Oriente. Series: Documenta Asiana, 2002. VII:474.
  • Petrosyan L. Lchashensky necropolis. Archaeological monuments of Armenia. Yerevan: 2018:22 (In Armenian).
  • Mikaelyan GA. Cyclopean fortresses of the Sevan basin. Archaeological monuments of Armenia. Monuments of the Bronze Age. Yerevan: 1968. 1(2) (in Armenian).
  • Yesayan SA. Ancient culture of the tribes of north-eastern Armenia (III-I millennium BC) [Drevnya kulʹtura plemen Severo-Vostochnoj Armenii (III - I tys. do n.è.)]. Piotrovsky BB., editor; Yerevan: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the Armenian SSR, 1976: 1:271 (In Russ).
  • Kunze R., Bobokhyan A., Meliksetian Kh., Pernicka E., Wolf D. Archäologische Untersuchungen zur Umgebung der Goldgruben in Armenien mit Schwerpunkt Sotk, Provinz Gegharkunik. Veröffentlichungen des Landesamtes für Denkmalpflege und Archäologie Sachsen Anhalt-Landesmuseum für Vorgeschichte 2011; 64: 17–49.
  • Kunze R., Bobokhyan A., Pernicka E., Meliksetian K. Projekt Ushkiani. Untersuchungen der Kulturlandschaft um das prähistorische Goldrevier von Sotk. Veröffentlichungen des Landesamtes für Denkmalpflege und Archäologie Sachsen Anhalt-Landesmuseum für Vorgeschichte 2013; 67:49–88.
  • Bobokhyan A., Kunze R. Ushkiani-Project: Preliminary Archaeological Investigations in the Lake Sevan Region, Armenia. Praehistorische Zeitschrift 2021; 96(2): 500–510. https://doi.org/10.1515/pz-2021-0012.
  • Badalyan R. From Homogeneity to Heterogeneity. The Periodization and Chronology of Kura-Araxes: The View from Armenia. 2001, The Caucasus: Bridge between the Urban Centres in Mesopotamia and the Pontic Stepps in the 4th and 3rd millennium BC. The Transfer of Knowledge and Technologies Between East and West in the Bronze Age, Proceedings of the Caucasus Conference/ Frankfurk am Main, November 28 – December 1, 2018 (editors. H. Von Lian Giemsch, S. Hanse). Schriftendes Archäologischen Museums Frankfurt 34, p. 211-222.
  • Kiguradze, T., Antonio G. Sagona. Origins of the Kura-Araxes Cultural Complex. In: Smith A.T., Rubinson K.S, editors. Archaeology in the Borderlands: Investigation in Caucasia and Beyond. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology; Los Angeles. Monograph 47, 2003:38–94.
  • Avetisyan P. The main trends in the transformation of the multicultural environment of the Armenian Highlands in the Early Bronze Age. Historical and Phylological Journal 2012; 2:3-19.
  • Amyryan M, Kunze R., Bobokhyan A. Eastern Shores of the Lake Sevan During the Early Bronze Age: Preliminary Reflections. 2022, in press.
  • Bobokhyan A., Khomutova T., Hovsepyan R. 2021. "Soil memory" and "Cultural memory" of historical landscapes of Armenia: Launching of a multidisciplinary study of Bronze and Early Iron Age sites. Review of Armenian Studies. Yerevan: "Gitutyun", 2021: 2 (26): 129-144.
  • Hovsepyan R., Khomutova T., Bobokhyan A. Prospects for the use of "soil memory" in archaeological research on the example of the sites of Sotk and Artanish (methodological review). Sotk։ cultural memory of the earth. [Sotk: kul’turnaya pamyat’ zemli]. Yerevan: IAE Publishing Houseж 2022: 34-41. (in Armenian)
  • Targulian VO., Bronnikova MA. Soil Memory: Theoretical Basics of the Concept, Its Current State, and Prospects for Development. Eurasian Soil Science. 2019; 52(3):229-243. doi: 10.1134/S1064229319030116.
  • Wilson CA., Davidson DA., Cresser MS. Multi-element soil analysis: an assessment of its potential as an aid to archaeological interpretations. J. Archeol. Sci. 2008; 35: 412-424. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2007.04.006.
  • Oonk S., Slomp CP., Huisman DJ. Geochemistry as an aid in archaeological prospection and site interpretation: current issues and research directions. Archaeol. Prospect. 2009;16: 35-51.
  • Hejeman M., Karlik P., Oandracek J., Klir T. Short-term medieval settlement activities irreversibly changed foresr soils and vegetation in Central Europe. Ecosystems 2013;16: 652-663.
  • Salisbury RB. Interpolating geochemical pattering of activity zones at Late Neolithic and Early Copper Age settlements in eastern Hungary. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2013; 40:926-934.
  • Knabb KA., Erel Y., Tirosh O., Rittenour T., Laparidou S., Najjar M., Levy TE. Environmental impacts of ancient copper mining and metallurgy: multi-proxy investigation of human-landscape dynamics in the Faynan valley, southern Jordan. J. Archarol. Sci. 2016; 74: 85-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2016.09.003.
  • Entwhistle JA., Abrahams PW., Dodgshon RA. Multi-element analysis of soils from Scottich historical sites, interpreting land-use history through the physical and geochemical analysis of soil. Journal of Archaeological Science 1998; 25:53-68. DOI:0305-4403/98/010053+16 $25.00/0/as970199.
  • Hejeman M., Ondracek J., Smrz Z. Ancient waste pits with wood ash irreversibly increase crop production in Central Europe. Plant Soil. 2011; 339:341-350.
  • Gall MJ. It’s elemental! A case study in the use of multi-element geochemical analysis as an aid in locating cultural features at the foundations site. Northeast Historical Archaeology 2012; 41:1-29.
  • Smeida L., Hejeman M., Horak J., Shai I. Ancient settlement activities as important sources of nutrients (P, K, S, Zn and Cu)) in Eastern Mediterranean ecosystems – The case of biblical Tel Burna, Israel. Catena 2017; 156:63-73.
  • Bintliff J., Degryse P. A review of soil geochemistry in archaeology // J. Archaeol. Sci.Reports 2022, 43:103419. DOI: 10.16/j.jasrep.2022.103419.
  • Ottaway J.H., Mathews M.R. Trace element analysis of soil samples from a stratified archaeological site// Environ. Geochem. Health 1988, 10:105-112.
  • Borisov AV., Demkina TS., Kashirskaya NN., Khomutova TE., Chernysheva EV. Changes in the past soil-forming conditions and human activity in soil biological memory: microbial and enzyme components. Eurasian Soil Science 2021; 54(7): 1078-1088. doi: 10.1134/S1064229321070024.
  • Margesin R., Siles J., Cajthaml T., Öhlinger B., Kistler E. Microbiology Meets Archaeology: Soil Microbial Communities Reveal Different Human Activities at Archaic Monte Iato (Sixth Century BC). Microbial Ecology 2016; 73(4): 925–938. doi: 10.1007/s00248-016-0904-8.
  • Peters S., Borisov A., Reinhold S., Korobov D., Thiemeyer H. Microbial characteristics of soils depending on the human impact on archaeological sites in the Northern Caucasus. Quaternary International 2014; 324(4):162–171 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2013.11.020.
  • Chernysheva E., Korobov D., Khomutova T., Fornasier F., Borisov A. Soil microbiological properties in livestock corrals: An additional new line of evidence to identify livestock dung. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 2021; 37:103012. doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.103012.
  • Saunders W.M., Williams E.G. 1955. Observations on the determination of total organic phosphorus in soils. Journal of Soil Science, 6(2), P. 254-267.
  • Potapova A.V., Pinskoy V.N., Gak E.I., Kashirskaya N.N., Borisov A.V. Variability of properties of cultural layer of the Bronze Age settlement Ksizovo-1 in the forest-steppe Don Region. Russian Archaeology, 2020, 1, P. 60-75.
  • Margenot AJ, Nakayama Y, Parikh SJ. Methodological recommendations for optimizing assays of enzyme activities in soil samples. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2018; 125:350-360. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.11.006.
  • Schinner F., Kandeler E., Ohlinger R., Margesin R. Methods in Soil Biology. NewYork: Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1996.
  • Nannipieri, P., Giagnoni, L., Landi, L., Renella, G. Role of Phosphatase Enzymes in Soil. In: Bünemann E., Oberson A., Frossard E. Phosphorus in Action. Soil Biology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011: 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15271-9_9.
  • Vodyanitsky Yu.N. Heavy and superheavy metals in contaminated soils. [Tyazhelye i sverkhtyazhelye metally v zagryaznennykh pochvakh]. Moscow: GNU DokuchaevSoil Institute publ., 2009: 95. (in Russ).
  • Babkina O.A. Hydrochemistry of strontium and barium in sodium chloride mineral waters and brines of the basin of the middle reaches of the Khoper river // Bulletin of VSU, Biology series. 2011; 31:236-240.
  • Filobok M.L. Dynamics of gross and mobile zinc in the agrolandscape system [Dinamika valovogo i podvizhnogo tsinka d sisteme agrolandshafta] (dissertation abstract). Krasnodar; 2006:24. (in Russ).

Supplementary files

There are no supplementary files to display.

Views

Abstract - 326

PDF (Russian) - 144

PlumX


Copyright (c) 2023 Khomutova T., Chernysheva E., Potapova A., Yeltsov M., Pinskoy V., Amiryan M.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.