The relevance of the problem under consideration, in addition to its epistemological interest, is also due to its practical significance. A large number of medieval archaeological and historical monuments of mountainous Ingushetia are disappearing, being destroyed before our eyes, and are in a dilapidated state. The state, having declared these objects of cultural heritage of the Ingush as its property, cares little about their preservation, practically does not allocate funds for their conservation and, moreover, restoration. Local teip communities are invited to finance these works themselves. However, even isolated cases of restoration work at the expense of sponsors cause a lot of disputes and questions. In particular, one of such pressing issues is the question of the restoration of combat towers according to one or another of their type, since they differ in their structural details, especially in their roofing part, which is most susceptible to destruction. Such controversial situations arose, for example, during the recent restoration of combat towers in the villages of Harp and Bisht of the Jeyrakh district of the Republic of Ingushetia. This problematic situation seems to be based on the imperfection of the existing classifications of Ingush combat towers.
The purpose of the article is a critical analysis of the basic principles (bases) of the classification of combat towers and an assessment of their suitability for the reconstruction of the appearance of the latter. To achieve this goal, it is supposed to analyze and compare the classifications available in the literature (including types and types of combat towers and their distinctive features), identify their weaknesses and strengths, as well as assess the suitability of existing classifications as a possible scientific and theoretical basis for the restoration of Ingush combat towers.
As a methodological basis for the research, this article uses a comparative analysis of the main classifications of Ingush combat towers, identification of possible classification principles and their assessment with the so-called suitability for the purposes of reconstruction of the appearance of the roofs of combat towers, as well as content analysis of the literary register of medieval tower structures of Ingushetia.

Israpil M. Sampiev

Ingush State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: israpil@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8672-3952
SPIN-code: 5514-2108

Russian Federation

D.Sc. (in Political science), Professor,

Head of the Department of sociology and political science

  • Semenov L.P. Archaeological and ethnographic investigations in mountainous Ingushetia in 1925-1832 Ingushetia. [Arheologicheskie i etnograficheskie razyskaniya v gornoj Ingushetii v 1925-1832 godah. ]. Nazran: LLC "Pilgrim", 2010. – 162 p. (In Russ).
  • Sheblykin I.P. Ingush art in the monuments of material culture. [Iskusstvo ingushej v pamyatnikah material'noj kul'tury]. Vladikavkaz, 1928. – 30 р. (In Russ).
  • Krupnov E.I. Medieval Ingushetia [Srednevekovaya Ingushetiya]. Magas: Serdalo, 2008. – 256 р. (In Russ).
  • Tmenov V.H. Architecture of medieval Ossetia. [Zodchestvo srednevekovoj Osetii]. Vladikavkaz: RIPP im. V.A. Gassieva, 1995. – 437p. (In Russ).
  • Muzhukhoev M.B. Medieval material culture of mountainous Ingushetia (XIII-XVII centuries). [Srednevekovaya material'naya kul'tura gornoj Ingushetii (XIII-XVII vv.)]. Grozny: Checheno-Ingushskoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo, 1977. – 179 р. (In Russ).
  • Skitskiy B.V. On the question of feudal relations in the history of the Ingush people. In: News CHINIIIYAL. History. V.1. [K voprosu o feodal'nyh otnosheniyah v istorii ingushskogo naroda. Izvestiya CHINIIIYAL. Istoriya.T.1]; Groznyj, 1959:187-189 (In Russ).
  • Gritsenko N.P. The development of feudal relations in Chechen-Ingushetia (XVI – the first half of the XIX century. In: Essays on the history of the Chechen-Ingush ASSR. Vol.1. Chapter IV. [Razvitie feodal'nyh otnoshenij v CHecheno-Ingushetii (XVI – pervaya polovina HIH v. Ocherki istorii CHecheno-Ingushskoj ASSR. T.1. Gl.IV.]; Groznyj, 1967: 118-159. (In Russ).
  • Dakhkilgov S.E. On the question of the socio-economic system of the Ingush (XVIII – 70s of the XIX century. In: Pages of the History of Ingushetia. [K voprosu o social'no-ekonomicheskom stroe ingushej (XVIII – 70-e goda XIX v). Stranicy istorii Ingushetii]; Nalchik: Publishing house of the center "El-Fa", 2005: 15-142. (In Russ).
  • Vinogradov V.B. The genesis of feudalism in the Central Caucasus. Voprosy Istorii. 1. 1981: 35-51 (In Russ).
  • Basilov V.N., Kobychev V.P. Galgai – the land of towers. Ethnographic Review. 1. 1971: 120-135 (In Russ).
  • Robakidze A.I. Some features of Mountain feudalism in the Caucasus. Soviet ethnography. 2. 1978: 15-24. (In Russ).
  • Gol'dshtejn A.F. Towers in the mountains [Bashni v gorah]. Moscow: Sovetskij hudozhnik, 1977. – 334 р. (In Russ).
  • Chahkiev D.Yu. Antiquities of mountainous Ingushetia [Drevnosti gornoj Ingushetii]. Vol. I. Nazran', 2003. – 143 р. (In Russ).
  • Chahkiev D.Yu. Antiquities of mountainous Ingushetia [Drevnosti gornoj Ingushetii]. Vol. I1. Nal'chik: Respublikanskij poligrafkombinat, 2009. – 93 s. (In Russ).
  • Gadiev U.B., Mackovskij V.V. Dendrochronological studies in Ingushetia in 2014-2015. Proceedings of the republican of the International Scientific Conference “Study and preservation of the archaeological heritage of the peoples of the Caucasus “XXIX Krupnov readings” [Izuchenie i sohranenie arheologicheskogo naslediya narodov Kavkaza. XXIX Krupnovskie chteniya. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii]; 2016 apr 18-21; Groznyj. Grozny: Publishing House of the Chechen State University, 2016: 269-270. (In Russ).
  • Gadiev U.B., Mackovsky V.V. Dating of architectural monuments of mountainous Ingushetia by radiocarbon analysis. Proceedings of the republican of the International Scientific Conference “The Caucasus in the system of cultural relations of Eurasia in Antiquity and the Middle Ages “XXX Krupnov readings” [Kavkaz v sisteme kul'turnyh svyazej Evrazii v drevnosti i srednevekov'e. XXX «Krupnovskie chteniya» po arheologii Severnogo Kavkaza». Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii]; 2018 apr 22-29; Karachaevsk. Karachaevsk: Publishing House of U.D. Aliyev Karachay-Cherkess State University, 2018: 229-231. (In Russ).
  • Gadiev U.B., Mackovsky V.V. New results of radiocarbon studies of architectural monuments of mountainous Ingushetia. Proceedings of the republican of the International Scientific Conference “The archaeological heritage of the Caucasus: actual problems of study and preservation. “XXXI Krupnov readings” [Arheologicheskoe nasledie Kavkaza: aktual'nye problemy izucheniya i sohraneniya. XXXI Krupnovskie chteniya. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii, posvyashchennoj 50-letiyu Krupnovskih chtenij i 50-letiyu Derbentskoj arheologicheskoj ekspedicii]; 2018 apr 22-29; Mahachkala. Mahachkala: Publishing House “Mavraev"”, 2020: 318-319. (In Russ).
  • Robakidze A.I. Dwellings and settlements of mountain Ingush [Zhilishcha i poseleniya gornyh ingushej]. Kavkazskij etnograficheskij sbornik. Vol. II. Tbilisi, 1968: 41-117. (In Russ).
  • Afanas'eva V.K. Architecture of the countries of the Two Rivers and Mesopotamia. [Arhitektura stran Dvurech'ya i Mesopotamii]. Vseobshchaya istoriya arhitektury. Vol. 1. Moscow: VAA, 1970: 196-211. (In Russ).

Supplementary files

There are no supplementary files to display.


Abstract - 153

PDF (Russian) - 143


Copyright (c) 2023 Sampiev I.M.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.