ETHNIC ELEMENT IN THE CONTEMPORARY GEORGIAN POSTMODERNIST INTELLECTUAL DISCOURSE (“ARILI” AND “DIDGORI” AS ACTORS OF “IMAGINED COMMUNITIES” AND “INVENTED TRADITIONS”)

Authors

  • Maksim Valer'evic Kircanov Voronezh State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32653/CH162376-393

Keywords:

Georgia, intellectuals, ethnicity, ethnic culture, carteloba, actualization of ethnicity, nationalism

Abstract

The paper attempts to analyze collective ideas of ethnicity and ethnic culture in the modern intellectual discourse of Georgia in the context of interdisciplinary theories of nationalism. In the contemporary modernistic historiography nationalism is considered as a social and cultural construct and one of the consequences of modernization, which minimizes the factor of ethnicity, reduced to one of the invented traditions. The purpose of the article is to analyze various forms and dimensions of “ethnicity” and “ethnic” in modern Georgian cultural nationalism as a modernist and constructivist project. The author, using the methods of “imagined communities” and “invention of traditions” proposed in the modernist historiography of nationalism, and transplanting them into the contexts of the history of Georgian nationalism, suggests that 1) the modern project of nation in Georgia is based on the idea of Georgians as a political community and the actualization of the concepts of “kartveloba”; 2) Georgians are analyzed in terms of a political community, not a historical nation; 3) kartveloba is defined as an invented tradition, originated in intellectual discourse as a result of transplantation of western theories of nationalism. Therefore, the author, on the one hand, analyzes the role of ethnicity and ethnic culture as its institutionalized form, sanctioned by professional intellectuals as nationalists in the development of modern nationalist imagination in the contexts of the activities of Georgian intellectuals as the main inspirers of nationalist discourse, on the other hand, the author believes that 1) the Georgian intellectuals are active in their attempts to develop the concept of “kartveloba” as a synthetic, “imagined” or “invented” variant of the true Georgian identity; 2) they are not inclined to enthographize ethnic culture in the post-Soviet forms, rejecting the Soviet models of its museumification; 3) instead of an assimilative post-Soviet model of actualization of ethnic culture, Georgian intellectuals seek to revitalize and actualize it in the world of postmodernism and consumer society, which allowed us to synthesize the values of kartveloba as an ethnic culture and the principles of a nation as a political community. Thus, the author considers the Georgian model of the development of nationalism as a compromise: on the one hand, ethnic culture is represented in cultural spaces, while one the other hand intellectual transplantations of western culture do not exclude manifestations of Georgian ethnicity, facilitating its integration into the western canon.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Maksim Valer'evic Kircanov, Voronezh State University
    D.Sc. (in History) Associated Professor

References

Kohn H. The Idea of Nationalism: A Study in Its Origins and Background. NY.: Transaction Publishers, 2005:720.

Kohn H. Nationalism, Its Meaning and History. NY.: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Co., 1965:192.

Kohn H. Age of Nationalism: First Era of Global History. NY.: Harper and Row, 1962:172.

Hayes C.J.H. Nationalism. L. – NY.: Routledge, 2016:198.

Hayes C.J.H. The Growth of Nationalism 1848-1871. NY.: Perennial Press, 2018:66.

Hayes CJH. Essays on nationalism. NY.: The MacMillan Company, 1941:279.

Smith A. Nationalism and Modernism. L. – NY.: Routledge, 1998:288.

Stahl D. An Analysis of Ernest Gellner's Nations and Nationalism. NY.: Macat Library, 2017:105.

Hazony Y. The Virtue of Nationalism. NY.: Basic Books, 2018:305.

Greenfeld L. Nationalism: A Short History. NY.: Brookings Institution Press, 2019:150.

Hobsbawm EJ. Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012:220.

Gellner E. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press, 1983:170.

Anderson B. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. L.: Verso, 1983:256.

The Invention of Tradition / eds. E. Hobsbawm, T. Ranger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983:330.

Smith A. Nationalism: Theory, Ideology, History. L. – NY.: Polity, 2010:200.

Georgia after Stalin: Nationalism and Soviet power / eds. T.K. Blauvelt, J. Smith. L.: Routledge, 2015:212.

Manning P. Strangers in a Strange Land: Occidentalist Publics and Orientalist Geographies in Nineteenth-Century Georgian Imaginaries. NY.: Academic Studies Press, 2019:345.

Religion, Nation and Democracy in the South Caucasus / eds. A. Agadjanian, A. Jödicke, E. van der Zweerde. – L.: Routledge, 2014:295.

Suny RG. The Making of the Georgian Nation. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1994:412.

Kirchanov M. Instrumentalization and imagination of ethnicity: Kartvelism as an invented tradition Central Asia and the Caucasus. Journal of Social and Political Studies. 2017;18(3):25–34.

Kirchanov M. Karvelism as a development paradigm of Georgian ethnic nationalism Central Asia and Caucasus. Journal of Social and Political Studies. 2015; 16(1):102–113.

Kirchanov M. The main development vectors of Georgian nationalism in the context of political instability: between the Traditions of the Political Nation and the Challenges of Radicalization Central Asia and Caucasus. Journal of Social and Political Studies. 2010; 11(3):126– 37.

Chkhartishvili M. Georgian Identity: Stages of Development Georgian ldentity and Culture. Tbilisi: Universal, 2009:41–65.

Chkhartishvili M. Georgian Nationalism and the Idea of Georgian Nation Codrul Cosminului. 2013;19(2):189–206.

Science and strategies for dealing with the past. Discussion within the framework of the Contemporary Belarusian Thinking Seminar, Institute of Sociology, Institute of Philosophy, NASU, March 16, 2006 [Navuka i stratehii pracy z minulym. Dyskusija ŭ miežach sieminara «Sučasnaje bielaruskaje mysliennie», Instytut sacyjalohii, Instytut filasofii NAN, 16 sakavika 2006 hoda] Political sphere [Palityčnaja sfiera]. 2006(6):44-48.

Anchabadze Y. National History in Georgia: Myths, Ideology, Science [Natsional'naya istoriya v Gruzii: mify, ideologiya, nauka], National Histories in Soviet and Post-Soviet States [Natsional'nyye istorii v sovetskom i postsovetskikh gosudarstvakh] / eds. K. Aimmermacher, G. Bordyugov; forword F. Bomsdorf. M.: Friedrich Naumann Foundation, AIRO-XX, 2003: 159-175.

Scherrer J. Germany and France: a study of the past [Germaniya i Frantsiya: prorabotka proshlogo] Pro et contra. 2009:89-108.

Barkoŭski P. The Intellectual Manifesto: Here and Now [Inteliektuaĺny manifiest: tut i ciapier] Political sphere [Palityčnaja sfiera]. 2013;21(2):93-96.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-12

Issue

Section

Ethnography

How to Cite

1.
Kircanov MV. ETHNIC ELEMENT IN THE CONTEMPORARY GEORGIAN POSTMODERNIST INTELLECTUAL DISCOURSE (“ARILI” AND “DIDGORI” AS ACTORS OF “IMAGINED COMMUNITIES” AND “INVENTED TRADITIONS”). ИАЭК. 2020;16(2):376-393. doi:10.32653/CH162376-393