UNCERTAINTY REGIMES AND RISKS IN MIGRATION AND THE SOCIO-CULTURAL SPECIFICITY OF DAGESTAN

Abstract


The article proposes to consider the zones of uncertainty and risk in the lives of migrants from Dagestan using the example of long-term migration to the Arctic zone of Western Siberia. The focus will be on how migrants operate with various regimes of uncertainty and risk in migration precisely in the context of the socio-cultural specifics of the migrant-sending society. The article examines an example of the ambivalence of the uncertainty factor in the context of the translocal temporality of migrant life and the functioning of social networks. As a result of examining this migration case, several conclusions can be made. Firstly, it is worth recognizing that translocality as a theoretical scheme should not be perceived as a rigid impenetrable scheme and in the context of long-term migration, one way or another, a decrease in the competence of transmigrants regarding the socio-cultural and economic life of the sending region begins to occur, which increases the level of uncertainty in their translocal life. As a result, it is determined that not only life in the receiving society (a generally accepted point of view in migration studies) can become uncertain, but also in the sending one. Secondly, migrant social networks can not only reduce the feeling of uncertainty in a migrant, but also generate a zone of uncertainty that reduces his competence. Thirdly, translocal life in two worlds is always a challenge for a person's identity and the relationship between him and the basic elements of his life, which tend to double. This aspect of uncertainty was considered using the example of the perception of home by a translocal migrant from the north. In addition to the identified zones of uncertainty that appear in the situation of translocality, such a socio-cultural specificity of Dagestani society as the desire for risk was considered, which can be defined as a generally encouraged strategy of a daredevil. In this situation, migration as a risky undertaking can be perceived as a desired action for a male migrant. 


Ekaterina L. Kapustina

Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography of RAS

Author for correspondence.
Email: parlel@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7024-0072
http://eu-spb.academia.edu/EkaterinaKapustina

Russian Federation

Bio Statement: PhD (in Ethnography and Anthropology), Head Department of Ethnography of the Caucasus

 

Researcher focus: Ethnography of the peoples of the Caucasus,
Ethnography of Dagestan,Migration processes in the North Caucasus, transnationalism and translocality, Economic anthropology in the North Caucasus, Anthropology of the Caucasian city, social practices in Dagestan society, the fate of traditional crafts of Dagestan, Shiite communities of Dagestan,
the Dagestani community.

  • Williams, Allan M., and Vladimir Baláž. 2012. Migration, Risk, and Uncertainty: Theoretical Perspectives. Population, Space and Place 18(2): 167-180.
  • Koser K. 2008. Why migrant smuggling pays. International Migration 46: 3-26.
  • Stark O, Bloom DE. 1985. The new economics of labour migration. American Economic Review 75: 173-178.
  • Sjaastad L. The Costs and Returns of Human Migration // Journal of Political Economy 1962. P. 80-93 .
  • De Genova N. Migrant "Illegality" and Deportability in Everyday Life // Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 31 (2002), pp. 419-447
  • Reeves M.-Living from the nerves: Deportability, indeterminacy, and the'feel of law'in migrant Moscow. Social Analysis, 2015. Pp.119-136.
  • Urinboev R. Migration and transnational informality in post-Soviet societies: Ethnographic study of po rukam (‘handshake’) experiences of Uzbek migrant workers in Moscow/ Migrant Workers in Russia Global challenges of the shadow economy in societal transformation. Routledge 2017. Pp.70-93.
  • Tulloch J, Lupton D. 2003. Risk and Everyday Life. Sage: London.
  • Glick Schiller, N., Basch, L., and Blanc-Szanton, C. (1992). Towards a Definition of Transnationalism: Introductory Remarks and Research Questions. In N. Glick Schiller, L. Basch and C. Blanc-Szanton (Eds). Towards a transnational perspective on migration: Race, class, ethnicity, and nationalism reconsidered. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
  • Greiner, C., Sakdapolrak, P. Translocality: Concepts, applications and emerging research 1 perspectives. In: Geography Compass. (2013) 7(5), 373-384.
  • Автор 2019
  • Автор 2021.
  • Lyarskaya E.V., Vasilyeva V.V., Karaseva A.I. Leave and stay: social mechanics of northern migrations // “Children of the nineties” in the modern Russian Arctic: collection of articles / rep. ed. Nikolai Vakhtin, Stefan Dudek. St. Petersburg: EUSPb Publishing House, 2020. P.79-138 (In Russ).
  • Abashin, S. Returning home: Family and migration scenarios in Uzbekistan.Ab Imperio 2015(3), 125-165. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/imp.2015.0064 (In Russ).
  • Boccagni P. What ’ s in a (Migrant ) House? Changing Domest ic Spaces, the Negotiation of Belonging and Home-making in Ecuadorian Migrant ion, Housing, Theory and Society (2013): 1-17.
  • Brednikova O., Tkach O. House for nomads // Laboratorium. 2010. №3. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/dom-dlya-nomady (In Russ).
  • Kapustina EL. Food transfers in the life of a migrant: the specifics of migration between Dagestan and the cities of Western Siberia. Kunstkamera. 2020, 2: 191-200. (In Russ)
  • Massey, Douglas S., Joaquin Arango, Graeme Hugo, Ali Kouaouci, Adela Pellegrino, and J. Edward Taylor. Theories of International Migration: A Review and Appraisal // Population and Development Review 1993. 19(3). P. 431-466.
  • Boyd M. Family and personal networks in international migration: recent developments and new agendas. International Migration Review. 1989 Fall ;23(3). P. 638-70.
  • Goldring, L. "Power and Status in Transnational Social Spaces." Invited paper for Special Issue of Sozialen Welt on Transnational Migration, edited by L. Pries. Baden-Baden : Nomos Verlag. 1997.
  • Heitmueller A. Unemployment benefits, risk aversion, and migration incentives. Journal of Population Economics 2005 18: 93-112
  • Williams AM, Baláž V. International Migration and Knowledge.: Routledge: London 2008
  • Alwang JP 0egel B and Jorgensen SL. Vulnerability A View from Different Disciplines. The World Bank, Social Protection Discussion Paper Series No. 0115: New York 2001.
  • Fox, C.R., and A. Tversky. Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 1995. 110, no. 3. P. 585-603.
  • Lewis JD, Weigert A. Trust as a social reality. Social Forces 1985 63. P. 967-985.
  • Brednikova O. (Non-)return: can migrants become former? // Ethnographic review.2017. № 3. С. 32-47 (In Russ).
  • Mehta J. 2007. Being economic: Perspectives on risk and rationality. University of Kent, SCARR Working Paper 2007/18: Canterbury
  • Douglas M, Wildavsky A. 1982. Risk and Culture. an Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. University of California Press: Berkeley
  • Williams AM, Baláž V. 2008. International Migration and Knowledge.: Routledge: London
  • Karpov Y. Dzhigit and the wolf. Men's unions in the sociocultural tradition of the Caucasian mountaineers. SPb.: MAE RAS, 1996. (In Russ)/
  • Автор 2020
  • Belloni M. Risk in context: Decision-making in irregular and mixed migration // Mixed Migration Center. 02.12.2022. https://mixedmigration.org/risk-in-context-decision-making-in-irregular-and-mixed-migration/

Views

Abstract - 348

PDF (Russian) - 181

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Copyright (c) 2025 Kapustina E.L.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.