TECHNOLOGICAL METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION MILITARY ENGINEERING FACILITIES RUBAS FORTIFICATION VI C. (EAST CAUCASUS)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32653/CH182463-496

Keywords:

the Rubas fortification, East Caucasus, river valley of Rubas, Wall 1, Wall 2, Stepped structure 6, Wall 3, Platform 5, building techniques, masonry system, constructive building techniques, composition of building materials

Abstract

The article reviews building techniques, used for constructing a monumental fortification of the 6th century, erected in the river-valley of Rubas, near the village of Kommuna, Derbent region of the Republic of Dagestan.  The site includes six objects different in layout and construction, connected with building junctions into a single object – a construction of arched type, Wall 1, Long wall 2, Stepped structure 6, Wall 3, Platform 5. Analysis of the excavation material shows that the technology of their building was due to the functional purpose of these objects. Moreover, each of the architectural structures was built with the use of unique building techniques, variety of masonry, as well as the sizes of stone blocks and plates. The aim of the research is to conduct the analysis of the technological methods of constructing multi-type military-engineering fortifications; to determine the links of technological methods with the object’s functional purposes; to determine the level of development of construction engineering and architecture in the Peri-Caspian region in the era of the Great Migration of Peoples and the significance of this site as a military-defensive construction. The research methodology includes a detailed analysis of technological methods for the construction of military engineering structures; carrying out the classification of methods for the construction of defensive objects and the system of laying stone structures; analysis of building materials used in the construction of structures. The analysis of the excavation materials of the Rubas fortification shows that, according to the technology of construction, this object is close to the Derbent defensive complex of the middle 6th century (large stone blocks; massiveness of structures; the use of “opus quadratum” masonry; the presence of a bonding lime mortar, etc.). According to the main indicators (monumentality and functional orientation), this structure belongs to a series of barriers in the Western Peri-Caspian, built by Persia with the financial assistance of Byzantium in the era of the Great Migration of Peoples, typologically and chronologically similar to Derbent.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Ludmila Borisovna Gmyra, Institute of History, Archeology and Ethnography Daghestan Federal Research Centre of RAS
    DSc (in History) Leading Researcher

References

Gmyrya LB. Discovery of a new monumental fortification of Sasanian Iran in the valley of the river Rubas (Southern Dagestan) [Otkrytie novoy monumental’noy fortifikatsii Sasanidskogo Irana v doline r. Rubas (Yuzhnyy Dagestan)]. The scientific heritage. 2016, 6(1): 108-111.

Gmyrya LB. The construction of an arched structure in the system of a monumental defensive complex of the middle of the 6th century on the river Rubas in the Western Caspian [Sooruzhenie arochnoy konstruktsii v sisteme monumental’nogo oboronitel’nogo kompleksa serediny VI v. na r. Rubas v Zapadnom Prikaspii]. Society: Philosophy, History, Culture. 2018, 2: 38-44. (In Russ)

Gmyrya LB. International system of strategic defense in the Eastern Caucasus during the era of the Great Migration [Mezhdunarodnaya sistema strategicheskoy oborony na Vostochnom Kavkaze v epokhu Velikogo pereseleniya narodov]. RFBR – To the 100th Anniversary of Russian Academic Archeology: Catalog of scientific projects implemented with the financial support of the RFBR in 1992–2018. Vol. 2 in 2 vol.: Expeditions. Scientific forums [RFFI - K 100-letiyu Rossiyskoy akademicheskoy arkheologii: Katalog nauchnykh proektov, osushchestvlennykh pri finansovoy podderzhke RFFI v 1992–2018 gg. V. 2 t. T. 2: Ekspeditsii. Nauchnye forumy]. A.A. Malyshev, R.A. Kazakova, I.L. Rovinskaya (eds., comp.). Moscow: Russian Foundation for Basic Research. 2019: 178-181. (In Russ)

Gmyrya LB. Study of the new monumental fortification of Sasanian Iran on the river Rubas in South Dagestan and problems of interpretation of the object of archeology (2016–2018). [Issledovanie novoy monumental’noy fortifikatsii Sasanidskogo Irana na r. Rubas v Yuzhnom Dagestane i problemy interpretatsii ob”ekta arkheologii (2016–2018 gg.)] Abstracts of the second Symposium on Iran & North Caucasus of Russian Federation (Abstracts of the second symposium on Iran and the North Caucasus of the Russian Federation). June 16, 2019. IPIS. Tehran, 2019: 12-13. (In Russ)

Gmyrya LB. Specifics of Rubas fortification’s topography and layout (Eastern Caucasus). Izvestiya SOIGSI. 2019, 34: 5-25.

Gmyrya LB, Korzhenkov AM, Ovsyuchenko AN, Larkov AS, Rogozhin EA. Probable paleoseismic deformations at the Rubas archaeological site in the middle of the 6th century, Southern Dagestan [Veroyatnye paleoseysmicheskie deformatsii na Rubasskom arkheologicheskom pamyatnike seredina VI v., Yuzhnyy Dagestan]. Geophysical Processes and Biosphere. 2019, 18(3): 91-103.

Gmyrya LB, Korzhenkov AM, Ovsyuchenko AN, Larkov AS, Rogozhin EA. PProbable Paleoseismic Deformations at the Rubas Archeological Site, Mid-6th Century AD, South Dagestan Izyestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics. 2019, 55(10): 1547-558

Gmyrya LB, Saidov VA, Magomedov YuA. Study of the Rubas fortification in 2020 [Issledovanie Rubasskoy fortifikatsii v 2020 g.]. History, archeology and ethnography of the Caucasus. 2020, 16(4): 1099-1139. (In russ)

Gmyrya LB. Rubas fortification of the middle of the 6th century: layout features of the Eastern facade of Wall 2 [Rubasskaya fortifikatsiya serediny VI v.: osobennosti konstruktsii Vostochnogo fasada steny № 2]. History, archeology and ethnography of the Caucasus. 2021. 17(4): 912-937. (In Russ)

Gmyrya LB. The Rubas fortification of the middle 6th century: features of the structure of the eastern facade of wall 2. History, archeology and ethnography of the Caucasus. 2021, 17(4): 912-937.

Pakhomov EA. The largest monuments of the Sasanian construction in Transcaucasia. [Krupneyshie pamyatniki sasanidskogo stroitel’stva v Zakavkaz’e] Problems of the history of material culture. 1933, 9-10: 39-46. (In Russ)

Trever KV. Essays on the history and culture of Caucasian Albania. 4th century BC – 7th century AD [Ocherki po istorii i kul’ture Kavkazskoy Albanii. IV v. do n.e. – VII v. n.e.]. Moscow; Leningrad, 1959. (In Russ)

Aliev AA, Aliev IN, Gadzhiev MS, Geitner MG, Kohl FL, Magomedov RG. New studies of the Gilgilchay defensive wall [Novye issledovaniya Gil’gil’chayskoy oboronitel’noy steny]. Problems of history, philology and culture. 2004, 14: 441-465. (In Russ)

Gadzhiev MS. Kudryavtsev AA. Steinmetzzeichen des 6. Jahrhunderts N. Chr. in Darband Archaologische Mitteilungen aus Iran und Turan. 2001, 33: 357-390. (in German)

Kudryavtsev AA. “Long Walls” in the Eastern Caucasus [«Dlinnye steny» na Vostochnom Kavkaze]. Questions of History. 1979, 11: 31-43. (In Russ)

Blavatsky VD. Essays on military affairs in the ancient states of the Northern Black Sea region [Ocherki voennogo dela v antichnykh gosudarstvakh Severnogo Prichernomor’ya]. Moscow, 1954. (In Russ)

Archeology of the USSR. Ancient states of the Northern Black Sea region [Antichnye gosudarstva Severnogo Prichernomor’ya]. Moscow: Nauka, 1984. (In Russ)

Pletneva SA. From nomads to cities. Saltovo-Mayak culture [Ot kocheviy k gorodam. Saltovo-mayatskaya kul’tura]. Moscow: Nauka, 1967. (In Russ)

Vus OV. Early Byzantine Limes in the Northern Black Sea Region: organization and structure of engineering defense [Rannevizantiyskiy Limes v Severnom Prichernomor’e: organizatsiya i struktura inzhenernoy oborony]. Vizantyiskyi vremennik. Moscow. 2013, 72(97): 227-246. (In Russ)

Ovcharov D. Bulgarians and Romanians on the Lower Danube in the Early Middle Ages (according to archaeological data): transl. from [Bolgary i rumyny na Nizhnem Dunae v Rannem Srednevekov’e (po arkheologicheskim dannym): per. s bolg. ] Bulgarian. History in Bulgarian: distortions and falsifications [Istoriya na b”lgarite: izkrivyavaniya i falshifikatsii]. Sofia, 2002: 170-200. (In Russ)

Mohammadreza Nemati, Mehdi Mousavinia, Eberhard Sauer & Carlo G. Cereti. Largest Ancient Fortress of South-West Asia and the Western World? Recent Fieldwork at Sasanian Qaleh Iraj at Pishva, Iran. Iran. Journal of the British Institute of Persian Studies. 2020, 28(2): 190-220.

Gmyrya LB. Report on the excavation of the archaeological heritage site “Remains of a monumental stone structure of the 5th – mid-6th centuries BC” on the river Rubas (village of Kommuna of the Derbent district of the Republic of Dagestan) in 2020 [Otchet o raskopkakh ob”ekta arkheologicheskogo naslediya «Ostatki monumental’nogo kamennogo stroeniya V – serediny VI v. » na r. Rubas (s. Kommuna Derbentskogo rayona Respubliki Dagestan) v 2020 g.]. Vol. 4. Makhachkala, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-23

Issue

Section

Archeology

How to Cite

1.
Gmyra LB. TECHNOLOGICAL METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION MILITARY ENGINEERING FACILITIES RUBAS FORTIFICATION VI C. (EAST CAUCASUS). ИАЭК. 2022;18(2):463-496. doi:10.32653/CH182463-496