P.-P.G. PRZHETSLAVSKY ON THE PEOPLES OF THE NORTHERN CAUCASUS: FORMATION OF VIEWS AND INFORMATIONAL VALUE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32653/CH221186-197

Keywords:

Caucasian Studies, research tradition, North Caucasian historiography, P.-P.G. Przhetslavsky, source analysis, Imam Shamil, ethnography of Dagestan, Russian imperial policy in the Caucasus

Abstract

This article provides a source-critical analysis of the journalistic and ethnographic legacy of P.-P.G. Przhetslavsky, a career military officer whose works serve as a representative historical source on the period of the Northern Caucasus’s incorporation into the Russian Imperial system. Based on a comprehensive study of his works, including the essay Dagestan: Its Manners and Customs and diary entries from his service as a bailiff to Imam Shamil in Kaluga, the author identifies the dual nature of this legacy. On one hand, the study highlights the significant informative value of Przhetslavsky’s writings. His detailed descriptions of administrative structures, economic activities (terrace farming, animal husbandry, and handicrafts), statistical data, elements of daily life (housing, food, clothing), and customary law laid the foundation for subsequent ethnographic and historical research. These materials preserve unique data regarding the transformation of North Caucasian society following the Caucasian War. On the other hand, the article provides a reasoned argument regarding the author’s strong bias and subjectivity, which is particularly evident in his contentious relationship with Shamil. The use of evaluative clichés (such as “savage peoples”), the intentional disparagement of the Imam, and the contextual distortion of facts (extending even to inaccurate citations of the Quran) demonstrate Przhetslavsky’s rigid, pro-government stance. This perspective was shaped by his official status and his conviction in Russia’s “civilizing mission.” The study concludes that, despite an inevitable ideological bias, Przhetslavsky’s works remain vital historical documents. Their critical analysis allows researchers not only to reconstruct various aspects of life among the peoples of Dagestan but also to understand the mechanisms behind the formation and function of imperial knowledge regarding the Caucasus – a key objective of contemporary Caucasian Studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Ruslan Aslanovic Tlepcok, RGAU-Moscow Agricultural Academy named after K.A. Timiryazev
    Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor

References

Sheudzhen EA. Preface. The process of incorporation of the Caucasus into the Russian Empire. Extracts from “Vestnik Evropy” (1802–1918), introduction, preparation of texts and comments by R.A. Tleptsok; ed. by E.A. Sheudzhen. Moscow: Socio-humanitarian Knowledge Publishing House, 2010. (In Russ)

Przhetslavsky P. A few words about the military and civil structure of Chechnya and Dagestan during the reign of Imam Shamil. Kavkaz. Tiflis, 1863; 62-64. (In Russ)

Przhetslavsky P. Memory of the blockade of the city of Derbent in 1831 (From the memories of an eyewitness). Voennyi Sbornik. 1864; 2. (In Russ)

Przhetslavsky P. Dagestan, its morals and customs. The process of incorporation of the Caucasus into the Russian Empire. Extracts from “Vestnik Evropy” (1802–1918). 2010: 159-209. (In Russ)

Shamil in Kaluga. Notes of Colonel P.G. Przhetslavsky. Russkaya Starina. 1877-1878; 20: 253-276, 471-506; 21: 41-64. (In Russ)

Baskhanov MK. Przhetslavsky Pavel-Platon Gilyarevich. Russian military orientalists before 1917. Bio-bibliographical dictionary. Moscow, 2005: 109. (In Russ)

Przhetslavsky P.G. Collection of Russian-Tatar conversations for those who do not know Arabic script, with the addition of a complete dictionary and the most necessary grammatical rules explaining the turns of common speech in the Azerbaijani and Kumyk dialects, commonly understood in the Caucasus [Manuscript]. Gunib, 1862. (In Russ)

Runovsky AI. Notes on Shamil by a bailiff under a prisoner of war. Saint-Petersburg: Typography of K. Wulf, 1860. (In Russ)

Gadzhiev BI. Shamil. From Gimry to Medina. Makhachkala: Dagestan Book Publishing House, 1992. (In Russ)

Zakharyin IN. Meetings and memories: from the literary and military world. Saint-Petersburg: M.V. Pirozhkov, 1903. (In Russ)

Kaziev ShM. Imam Shamil. Moscow, 2001.

The Quran. Translation of meanings and comments, transl. from Arabic and comments by E. Kuliev. Moscow, 2005. (In Russ)

Rosen RF. Description of Chechnya and Dagestan in 1830. Materials on the history of Dagestan and Chechnya. Vol. III. Pt. I. 1804-1839. Makhachkala, 1940. (In Russ)

Komarov AV. Population of the Dagestan region. Notes of the Caucasian department of the Imperial Russian Geographical Society. Tiflis, 1873; 8. (In Russ)

Summary of statistical data on the population of the Transcaucasian region, extracted from the family lists of 1886. Tiflis: Typography of I. Martirosiyants, 1893. (In Russ)

Gumilev LN. Ethnogenesis and the biosphere of the Earth. Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1990. (In Russ)

Ibragimov A.V. The work of Ibn al-Wardi “Kharidat al-Aja'ib wa Faridat al-Gara'ib.” Eurasian Journal of Philology, Science and Education. 2018; 131(1): 65-69. (In Russ)

Tleptsok R., Sheudzhen E. The Circassians (Adyghe): the symbolic meaning of the Caucasus Mountains. Fashion through History: Costumes, Symbols, Communication. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2017; 1: 196-197.

Ankersmit F.R. Sublime historical experience, transl. from English; ed. by A.A. Oleynikov. Moscow: Evropa, 2007. (In Russ)

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

Issue

Section

Ethnography

How to Cite

1.
Tlepcok RA. P.-P.G. PRZHETSLAVSKY ON THE PEOPLES OF THE NORTHERN CAUCASUS: FORMATION OF VIEWS AND INFORMATIONAL VALUE. ИАЭК. 2026;22(1):186-197. doi:10.32653/CH221186-197