THE RUBAS FORTIFICATION OF THE MID 6TH CENTURY: FEATURES OF THE STRUCTURE OF THE EASTERN FACADE OF WALL 2

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32653/CH174912-937

Keywords:

Rubas fortification, East Caucasus, Main Wall 2, structure of the eastern facade, Sasanian Iran

Abstract

The Rubas fortification is a unique complex of stone military-engineering structures, built in the lower reaches of the River Rubas, 20 km west of the Caspian Sea coast and the same distance southwest of the Derbent Pass. In terms of the main indicators (monumentality and functional orientation), it belongs to a series of defensive lines of the Western Caspian region, erected by Persia with the assistance of Byzantium during the era of the Great People’s Migration. Typologically and chronologically, it has analogies with the fortress structures of Derbent, dating back to the 6th century. Its uniqueness is justified by the presence of monumental military-engineering structures of various parameters in terms of design and layout, united by construction links into a single object. Each structure carried a separate function, complementing the general tasks of a defensive nature. The structure of the eastern facade of Wall 2 is of combined nature, since it comprises of several different types of sections. The present article considers the features of building techniques for the construction of the facade of a monumental wall of a defensive structure, which are distinguished by a main direction. The purpose of this study is to analyze engineering solutions and to determine the functional tasks of each object included in the eastern facade of Wall 2. Research methods include detail analysis of techniques of erecting the eastern facade of Wall 2, substantiation of presence of various structure parts of its sections and identification of functional purpose of the synthesis system of the facade’s structure of the main wall. Analysis of materials of the structurally complex defensive object of the Rubas fortification of the middle of the 6th century, which is the main monumental Wall 2, namely its outer eastern facade, shows that the complex of engineering solutions of this structure was mainly due to the volume of external loads and the strategy of assault on a particular enemy, which at that time were the nomadic Turkic-speaking tribes who used Derbent passage for military operations in the Caucasus and the Middle East.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Ludmila Borisovna Gmyra, Institute of History, Archeology and Ethnography Dagestan Federal Research Center of RAS
    Dr. Sci. (History), Leading Researcher

References

Gmyrya LB, Saidov VA, Magomedov YuA. Study of the Rubas fortification in 2018. History, archeology and ethnography of the Caucasus. 2019, 15(1): 62-86. (In Russ)

Gmyrya LB, Saidov VA, Magomedov YuA. Study of the Rubas fortification in 2020.History, archeology and ethnography of the Caucasus. 2020, 16(4): 1099-1139. (In Russ)

Gmyrya LB. Specifics of the Rubas fortification’s topography and layout (East Caucasus). Izvestiya SOIGSI. 2019, 34(73): 5–25. (In Russ)

Gmyrya LB, Shikhaliev Sh.Sh., Shekhmagomedov M.G., Kuzeeva Z.Z. Ceramic jug with an imprint of the text of the ayat Surah Koran from Southern Dagestan (XII century). Herald of the Dagestan Scientific Center. 2015, 56: 28-35. (In Russ)

Gmyrya LB, Korzhenkov A.M., Ovsyuchenko A.N., Larkov A.S., Rogozhin E.A. Probable field seismic deformations at the Rubas archaeological site of the middle of the 6th century. Southern Dagestan. Geophysical Processes and Biosphere. 2019, 18(3): 91-103.

Gmyrya LB, Korzhenkov A.M., Ovsyuchenko A.N., Larkov A.S., Rogozhin E.A. Probable Paleoseismic Deformations at the Rubas Archeological Site, Mid-6th Century AD, South Dagestan. ISSN 0001-4338, Izyestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics. 2019, 55(10): 1547-1558. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2019. Russian Text © The Author (s), 2019, published in Geofizicheckie Protsessy I Biosfera, 2019, 18(3): 91–103.

Pakhomov E.A. The largest monuments of Sassanian construction in the Transcaucasus. Problems of the history of material culture. 1933, 9-10: 39-46. (In Russ)

Trever K.V. Essays on the history and culture of Caucasian Albania. IV century BC - VII century AD. Moscow; Leningrad, 1959. (In Russ)

Aliev A.A., Aliev I.N., Gadjiev M.S., Geithner M.G., Kohl F.L., Magomedov R.G. New studies of the Gilgilchay defensive wall. Problems of history, philology and culture. 2004, 14: 441-465. (In Russ)

Gadjiev M.S., Kudryavcev A.A. Steinmetzzeichen des 6. Jahrhundert in Darband. Archäologische Mitteilungeaus Iran und Turan. Hrsg. vom Deutschen Archäologischen Institut Eurasien-Abteilung, A u Benstelle. Teheran. Bd. 33. Berlin: Reimer, 2001:357-390.

Vus OV. Early Byzantine Limes in the Northern Black Sea Region: Organization and Structure of Engineering Defense. Byzantine Times. Moscow. 2013, 72(97): 227–246.

Ovcharov D. Bulgarians and Romanians on the Lower Danube in the early Middle Ages (according to archaeological data): trans. fromBulg. History in Bulgarian: crooked and falsified. Sofia, 2002. p. 170–200. (In Russ)

Gmyrya LB. The land of the Huns at the Caspian Gates. Makhachkala: Dagknigizdat, 1995. (In Russ)

Gmyrya LB. The descendants of the Huns in the steppes of South-Eastern Europe. The history of the Tatars from the ancient times (in 7 volumes). Vol. I. Peoples of the steppe Eurasia in ancient time. S. Klyashtoryny (ed.). Kazan: Rukhiyat, 2002. (In Russ)

Gmyrya LB. The Great Walls of the East Caucasus. Anti-civilization aspect of their significance in the global historical process. 3rd International congress on ancient archeology of Eurasian steppes “Between the East and the West: the shift of cultures, technologies and empires”. N.N. Kradin, A.G. Sitdikov (eds.). Vladivostok: Dalnauka, 2017.

Published

2021-12-29

Issue

Section

Archeology

How to Cite

1.
Gmyra LB. THE RUBAS FORTIFICATION OF THE MID 6TH CENTURY: FEATURES OF THE STRUCTURE OF THE EASTERN FACADE OF WALL 2. ИАЭК. 2021;17(4):912-937. doi:10.32653/CH174912-937