AL DEMON IN THE CONTEXT OF CAUCASIAN CONTACT ZONES

Authors

  • Асмик Генриковна Галстян Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography NAS RA
  • Айк Ерджаникович Акопян Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, NAS RA; Research Institute of Ancient Manuscripts named after Mesrop Mashtots (Matenadaran); Institute of Oriental Studies of Russian-Armenian University 0000-0002-4238-2102 (unauthenticated)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32653/CH1941074-1081

Keywords:

Keywords, low mythology, demon Al, Armenia, Dagestan, Georgia, Iran, contact zones

Abstract

The cultural landscape of the South and North Caucasus is marked by distinct religious characteristics, exhibiting a shared essence typical of contact zones. Within the religious mosaic of the local population, there is a blend of indigenous and imported, deeply ancient layers. Since at the core of people’s worldview are beliefs connected not only with gods or God but also with all kinds of “lower,” unclean beings that do not have the status of God, mythical creatures called demons and spirits, which interfere in human destinies, lives, living among people and transforming into them. In Armenian scholarly circles, the topic of lower mythology was initially addressed by Manuk Abegyan (1865-1944) in 1899 in his work “Armenian Folk Beliefs.” Grounded in Armenian pre-Christian tradition, he labeled this phenomenon as “lower mythology,” present among all peoples of the world, emphasizing the conservatism of thinking. The similarity of demonological representations among Armenians and neighboring peoples, including identical names with some linguistic nuances, was already observed in the 19th century within Armenian scientific circles. The peoples of the South and North Caucasus are primarily indigenous to the region, and comprehensive demonological studies providing a holistic picture of the region are lacking. Based on the above, this study aims to consolidate various theories of the origin of the demon/demoness “Al” and its functions. It also seeks to understand the pathways through which this character spread to the Caucasus, specifically the North Caucasus. The article employs interdisciplinary methods, drawing on existing literature on the subject, field ethnographic research, and information from Armenian manuscripts at Matenadaran (the Mesrop Mashtots Institute of Ancient Manuscripts). Based on the information provided in the article, it can be asserted that Al is a demon or demoness who harms newborns and women in labor. Additionally, Al has similar names and functions among the peoples of the South and North Caucasus. Considering the fact that there are three theories about the origin of Al - Iranian, Turkic, and Mesopotamian (with most experts inclined to consider Al as the demonization of the Iranian supreme deity Ahura Mazda), it is more likely that Al is either an indigenous character in the South Caucasus and the North Caucasus, or Al migrated to the North Caucasus through Armenian and Georgian substrates.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Асмик Генриковна Галстян, Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography NAS RA
    Researcher
  • Айк Ерджаникович Акопян, Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, NAS RA; Research Institute of Ancient Manuscripts named after Mesrop Mashtots (Matenadaran); Institute of Oriental Studies of Russian-Armenian University
    Ph.D. in Нistory, Senior Researcher

References

REFERENCES

Ivanov V., Lower mythology, Myths of the peoples of the world, encyclopedia, vol. 2, Moscow, 2008, p. 215-216.

Abeghyan M., Der armenische Volksglaube. Inaugural-Dissertation der hohen Philosophischen Fakultät der Universität Jena zur Erlangung der Doctorwürde. Leipzig: Drugulin, 1899, s. 16.

Palasanian St., History of Armenian Literature, vol. 1, Oral Literature, Tiflis, 1865, p. 179-180.

Arakelova V., "Al. Spirit Possession: The Caucasus, Central Asia, Iran, and Afghanistan", Encyclopedia of Women and Islamic Culture, vol.3, Brill: Leiden, 2007, p. 21.

Chlaidze L., Ali, Myths of the peoples of the world, vol. 1, Moscow, 1987, p. 59.

Mamedov A. Alpab (Lezgin belief) // SMOMPC. Tiflis, 1892. Issue. 13. pp. 145-146

Seferbekov R. Characters of the lower mythology of the peoples of Dagestan. – Makhachkala, 2019, p. 159.

Arakelova V., Introduction to the history and culture of the Talysh people, Edited by G.S. Asatryan, Yerevan 2011, p. 84.

Egiazarov A., Solomon,A brief ethnographic sketch of the Kurds in the Erivan Governorate, with the addition of texts and a dictionary, Tiflis, Notes of the Caucasian Department of the Imperial Russian Geographical Society, XIII/2, 1891, p. 59.

"The Prayer of Almaz," HAB (Historical-Archaeological Bulletin), Volume 21, Tavush, № 21(1365), p. 246:

Dörfer Gerhard, Türkische und mongolische Elemente im Neupersischen: Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung älterer neupersischer Geschichtsquellen, vor allem der Mongolen- und Timuridenzeit I: Mongolische Elemente im Neupersischen; II: Türkische Elemente im Neupersischen: alif bis tā; III: Türkische Elemente im Neupersischen: gim bis kāf; IV: Türkische Elemente im Neupersischen (Schluß) und Register zur Gesamtarbeit. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1963-75 (Veröffentlichungen der Orientalischen Kommission 16 and 19-21), p. 524.

Basilov V., Albasty, Myths of the peoples of the world, encyclopedia, vol. 1, p. 58.

Behruz Mohamad Rudbaraki Kelari, Folk Beliefs of the Galesh, transcript of the dissertation for the candidate of historical sciences, Yerevan, 2012, p. 16.

Alishan G., The old faith or the pagan religion pf Armenia, Yerevan, 2002, p. 116.

Asatryan G., What is a fairy tale, Persian folk tales, Foreword, Yerevan, 2010, p. 8.

Acharyan H., Dictionary of Root words in Armenian, vol. A, Yerevan, 1971, p. 90.

Seferbekov R., On the mythology of the Tabasaranians, in Iran and the Caucasus. Research Papers from the Caucasian Centre for Iranian Studies, Yerevan (Tehran and Leiden) 5 (2001), pp. 130–148.

Lalayan E., Works, in five volumes, vol. 1, Yerevan, 1983, p. 236.

Fähnrich H., Leksikon georgische Mythologie, Wiesbaden 1999, S. 17.

Malkhaseants St., Armenian Explanatory Dictionary, no. 1, Yerevan, 1944, p. 19:

Abegian M., Works, Volume 7, p. 95.

Gabikean K., Dictionary of Sebast Armenian provincial language, Jerusalem, St. Jacobeans printing house, 1952, p. 369:

Asatrian G., Armenian Demonology: A Critical Overview, Iran and the Caucasus 17 (2013) 9-25, p. 21.

Atayan A., Salmast, Nor-Jugha, S. Printing house of the Most Savior Monastery, 1906, p. 103.

Minasian L., Rural word and thing, Peria province, Nor Jugha, 1998, p. 233.

Mkhitareants Agh., Fragments from Shirak Ambars, Eminean Ethnographic Collection, vol. A, Moscow-Alexandropol, Lazarian Seminary Oriental Language Publishing House, 1901, p. 195:

Ole Olufsen, Through the Unknown Pamirs. The Second Danish Pamir Expedition 1898-99. London: Heinemann, 1904, p. 367.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-15

Issue

Section

Ethnography

How to Cite

1.
Галстян АГ, Акопян АЕ. AL DEMON IN THE CONTEXT OF CAUCASIAN CONTACT ZONES. ИАЭК. 2023;19(4):1074-1081. doi:10.32653/CH1941074-1081